#43161From:Wilfred van Velzen
To:Ward Dossche
Date:15-01-2021 13:03:03
Subj:Re: Nlcheck report
Hi Ward,

On 2021-01-15 12:46:55, you wrote to me:

Wv>> Compared to the previous report there are 3 systems less in the list,
Wv>> and one added a PING flag to it's listing (test is underway)...

WD> Is this nodelist policing really necessary?

What is your objection against higher quality content in the nodelist? As a ZC you should welcome any initiative that helps that goal!?

Bye, Wilfred.

--- FMail-lnx64 2.1.0.18-B20170815
* Origin: FMail development HQ (2:280/464)
SEEN-BY: 124/5016 203/0 221/0 1 229/426 230/0 240/5832 250/1 261/38 263/1
SEEN-BY: 275/100 280/464 5003 5555 292/789 854 8125 310/31 320/219 331/51
SEEN-BY: 335/364 410/9 421/790 423/120 450/68 455/19 460/58 463/68 466/50
SEEN-BY: 467/70 469/122 480/25 712/848 2452/250 5015/46 5020/545 715 921 961
SEEN-BY: 5020/2992 5452 9696 5022/2 5023/24 5030/115 5034/13 5055/73 5057/19
SEEN-BY: 5061/15 5075/35 128 6035/1 3 6090/1 14
PATH: 280/464 292/854 5020/715 6090/1
#43162From:Benny Pedersen
To:Ward Dossche
Date:16-01-2021 02:16:14
Subj:Re: Nlcheck report
Hello Ward!

15 Jan 2021 12:46, Ward Dossche wrote to Wilfred van Velzen:

Wv>> Compared to the previous report there are 3 systems less in the list,
Wv>> and one added a PING flag to it's listing (test is underway)...

WD> Is this nodelist policing really necessary?

what is really needed ?

better nodelist with utf8 ?

/me hiddes


Regards Benny

... too late to die young :)

--- Msged/LNX 6.1.2 (Linux/5.10.7-gentoo-x86_64 (x86_64))
* Origin: I will always keep a PC running CPM 3.0 (2:230/0)
SEEN-BY: 203/0 221/0 1 229/426 230/0 150 152 250/1 261/38 263/1 275/100
SEEN-BY: 280/464 292/789 854 8125 320/219 331/51 335/364 410/9 421/790 450/68
SEEN-BY: 455/19 463/68 466/50 467/70 469/122 480/25 712/848 5015/46 5020/715
SEEN-BY: 5020/921 961 2992 5452 9696 5022/2 5023/24 5030/115 5034/13 5055/73
SEEN-BY: 5057/19 5061/15 5075/35 128 6035/1 3 6090/1 14
PATH: 230/0 292/854 5020/715 6090/1
#43163From:Benny Pedersen
To:Wilfred van Velzen
Date:16-01-2021 02:18:06
Subj:Re: Nlcheck report
Hello Wilfred!

15 Jan 2021 13:03, Wilfred van Velzen wrote to Ward Dossche:

WvV> What is your objection against higher quality content in the
WvV> nodelist? As a ZC you should welcome any initiative that helps that
WvV> goal!?

as i read w@rd here there is no goall at all

not even errflags needs any love any more


Regards Benny

... too late to die young :)

--- Msged/LNX 6.1.2 (Linux/5.10.7-gentoo-x86_64 (x86_64))
* Origin: I will always keep a PC running CPM 3.0 (2:230/0)
SEEN-BY: 203/0 221/0 1 229/426 230/0 150 152 250/1 261/38 263/1 275/100
SEEN-BY: 280/464 292/789 854 8125 320/219 331/51 335/364 410/9 421/790 450/68
SEEN-BY: 455/19 463/68 466/50 467/70 469/122 480/25 712/848 5015/46 5020/715
SEEN-BY: 5020/921 961 2992 5452 9696 5022/2 5023/24 5030/115 5034/13 5055/73
SEEN-BY: 5057/19 5061/15 5075/35 128 6035/1 3 6090/1 14
PATH: 230/0 292/854 5020/715 6090/1
#43164From:Ward Dossche
To:Wilfred van Velzen
Date:16-01-2021 15:55:06
Subj:Re: Nlcheck report
Wilfred,

Wv>WD> Is this nodelist policing really necessary?

Wv> What is your objection against higher quality content in the nodelist? As
Wv> a ZC you should welcome any initiative that helps that goal!?

Objection? Where?

I'm just wondering about the necessity to insult another nodelist submitter somewhere by suggesting he/she isn't doing his/her job and you need to verify this.

As an addition, it's always amusing when people start calling me the ZC when they have a point to push.

\%/@rd

--- DB4 - Dec.21 2020
* Origin: Hou het veilig, hou vol. Het komt allemaal weer goed (2:292/854)
SEEN-BY: 203/0 221/1 229/426 230/0 250/1 261/38 263/1 275/100 280/464 292/789
SEEN-BY: 292/854 8125 320/219 331/51 335/364 410/9 421/790 450/68 455/19
SEEN-BY: 463/68 466/50 467/70 469/122 480/25 712/848 5015/46 5020/715 921 961
SEEN-BY: 5020/2992 5452 9696 5022/2 5023/24 5030/115 5034/13 5055/73 5057/19
SEEN-BY: 5061/15 5075/35 128 6035/1 3 6090/1 14
PATH: 292/854 5020/715 6090/1
#43165From:Karel Kral
To:Ward Dossche
Date:17-01-2021 19:14:27
Subj:Nlcheck report
Hello Ward!

16 Jan 21 15:55, you wrote to Wilfred van Velzen:

WD> I'm just wondering about the necessity to insult another nodelist
WD> submitter somewhere by suggesting he/she isn't doing his/her job and
WD> you need to verify this.

Was it already considered in the past to use email as an trasport layer?

Karel

--- GoldED+/LNX 1.1.5-b20180707
* Origin: Plast DATA (2:423/39)
SEEN-BY: 203/0 221/1 6 242 360 229/426 230/0 250/1 261/38 263/1 275/100
SEEN-BY: 280/464 5003 5555 292/789 854 8125 320/219 331/51 335/364 410/9
SEEN-BY: 420/33 333 421/79 83 790 423/36 39 81 120 121 450/68 455/19 463/68
SEEN-BY: 466/50 467/70 469/122 480/25 712/848 5015/46 5020/715 921 961 2992
SEEN-BY: 5020/5452 9696 5022/2 5023/24 5030/115 5034/13 5055/73 5057/19
SEEN-BY: 5061/15 5075/35 128 6035/1 3 6090/1 14
PATH: 423/39 81 221/1 292/854 5020/715 6090/1
#43166From:Ward Dossche
To:Karel Kral
Date:17-01-2021 22:44:01
Subj:Re: Nlcheck report
Karel,

KK> Was it already considered in the past to use email as an trasport layer?

Yes ... since April 15th 1999.

I've serviced some downlinks that way, until recently Homrighausen had such a link here. I also service FTP-links.

\%/@rd

--- DB4 - Dec.21 2020
* Origin: Hou het veilig, hou vol. Het komt allemaal weer goed (2:292/854)
SEEN-BY: 203/0 221/1 229/426 230/0 250/1 261/38 263/1 275/100 280/464 292/789
SEEN-BY: 292/854 8125 320/219 331/51 335/364 410/9 421/790 450/68 455/19
SEEN-BY: 463/68 466/50 467/70 469/122 480/25 712/848 5015/46 5020/715 921 961
SEEN-BY: 5020/2992 5452 9696 5022/2 5023/24 5030/115 5034/13 5055/73 5057/19
SEEN-BY: 5061/15 5075/35 128 6035/1 3 6090/1 14
PATH: 292/854 5020/715 6090/1
#43167From:Alexey Vissarionov
To:Karel Kral
Date:18-01-2021 03:33:00
Subj:Nlcheck report
Good ${greeting_time}, Karel!

17 Jan 2021 19:14:54, you wrote to Ward Dossche:

WD>> I'm just wondering about the necessity to insult another nodelist
WD>> submitter somewhere by suggesting he/she isn't doing his/her job
WD>> and you need to verify this.
KK> Was it already considered in the past to use email as an trasport
KK> layer?

We (here in R50) are about to make that (email nodes) comply to some unified rules to submit a standart proposal (FSP).

Also, we are ready to commit a "secure binkp" proposal, but... I'd prefer to wait well before the beginning of a civil war in Z1.

Anyway, who cares? :-)


--
Alexey V. Vissarionov aka Gremlin from Kremlin
gremlin.ru!gremlin; +vii-cmiii-ccxxix-lxxix-xlii

... that's why I really dislike fools.
--- /bin/vi
* Origin: ::1 (2:5020/545)
SEEN-BY: 50/279 124/5016 203/0 221/0 1 6 229/426 230/0 240/5832 250/1 261/38
SEEN-BY: 263/1 275/100 280/464 5003 5555 292/789 854 8125 310/31 320/219
SEEN-BY: 331/51 335/364 410/9 421/790 423/120 450/68 455/19 460/58 463/68
SEEN-BY: 466/50 467/70 469/122 480/25 712/848 2452/250 5015/46 5020/400 545
SEEN-BY: 5020/715 736 921 961 2992 4441 5452 9696 5022/2 5023/24 5025/3 75
SEEN-BY: 5030/115 1957 2104 2404 5034/13 5035/85 5042/18 5053/400 5054/1
SEEN-BY: 5055/73 5057/19 5061/15 5066/18 5075/35 128 5080/102 5085/13 5095/20
SEEN-BY: 6035/1 3 6090/1 14
PATH: 5020/545 280/464 292/854 5020/715 6090/1
#43168From:Nick Andre
To:Alexey Vissarionov
Date:17-01-2021 20:06:13
Subj:Re: Nlcheck report
On 18 Jan 21 03:33:00, Alexey Vissarionov said the following to Karel Kral:

AV> Also, we are ready to commit a "secure binkp" proposal, but... I'd prefer t
AV> wait well before the beginning of a civil war in Z1.

Why would there be a "civil war" in Z1?

Nick

--- Renegade vY2Ka2
* Origin: Joey, do you like movies about gladiators? (1:229/426)
SEEN-BY: 203/0 221/1 229/426 230/0 250/1 261/38 263/1 275/100 280/464 292/789
SEEN-BY: 292/854 8125 320/219 331/51 335/364 410/9 421/790 450/68 455/19
SEEN-BY: 463/68 466/50 467/70 469/122 480/25 712/848 5015/46 5020/715 921 961
SEEN-BY: 5020/2992 5452 9696 5022/2 5023/24 5030/115 5034/13 5055/73 5057/19
SEEN-BY: 5061/15 5075/35 128 6035/1 3 6090/1 14
PATH: 229/426 292/854 5020/715 6090/1
#43169From:Karel Kral
To:Ward Dossche
Date:18-01-2021 07:49:26
Subj:Nlcheck report
Hello Ward!

17 Jan 21 22:44, you wrote to me:

WD> I've serviced some downlinks that way, until recently Homrighausen had
WD> such a link here. I also service FTP-links.

Ah, ok. FTP sounds even more natural.

I understood it like then is more about agreement between uplink/downlink.

Karel

--- GoldED+/LNX 1.1.5-b20180707
* Origin: Plast DATA (2:423/39)
SEEN-BY: 203/0 221/1 6 242 360 229/426 230/0 250/1 261/38 263/1 275/100
SEEN-BY: 280/464 5003 5555 292/789 854 8125 320/219 331/51 335/364 410/9
SEEN-BY: 420/33 333 421/79 83 790 423/36 39 81 120 121 450/68 455/19 463/68
SEEN-BY: 466/50 467/70 469/122 480/25 712/848 5015/46 5020/715 921 961 2992
SEEN-BY: 5020/5452 9696 5022/2 5023/24 5030/115 5034/13 5055/73 5057/19
SEEN-BY: 5061/15 5075/35 128 6035/1 3 6090/1 14
PATH: 423/39 81 221/1 292/854 5020/715 6090/1
#43170From:Benny Pedersen
To:Ward Dossche
Date:18-01-2021 07:11:21
Subj:Re: Nlcheck report
Hello Ward!

17 Jan 2021 22:44, Ward Dossche wrote to Karel Kral:

WD> I've serviced some downlinks that way, until recently Homrighausen had
WD> such a link here. I also service FTP-links.

good to see dbridge now take the job of badness from irex :)


Regards Benny

... too late to die young :)

--- Msged/LNX 6.1.2 (Linux/5.10.7-gentoo-x86_64 (x86_64))
* Origin: I will always keep a PC running CPM 3.0 (2:230/0)
SEEN-BY: 203/0 221/0 1 229/426 230/0 150 152 250/1 261/38 263/1 275/100
SEEN-BY: 280/464 292/789 854 8125 320/219 331/51 335/364 410/9 421/790 450/68
SEEN-BY: 455/19 463/68 466/50 467/70 469/122 480/25 712/848 5015/46 5020/715
SEEN-BY: 5020/921 961 2992 5452 9696 5022/2 5023/24 5030/115 5034/13 5055/73
SEEN-BY: 5057/19 5061/15 5075/35 128 6035/1 3 6090/1 14
PATH: 230/0 292/854 5020/715 6090/1
Выделенный сервер за 149 руб!